Federal government to backtrack on lighting efficiency plans

June 3, 1011

CALGARY — The Pembina Institute does not accept Natural
Resources Canada's (NRCAN) proposal to delay the phase out of inefficient
incandescent light bulbs by two years, citing the government's own analysis
that shows the delay would cost Canadian consumers more than $300 million,
increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 13 million tonnes, and waste 24
billion kilowatt hours of electricity.

"Delaying the phase out of inefficient light bulbs creates
more harm than benefit, environmentally and economically," said Jesse Row,
Director of community energy solutions at the Pembina Institute "In fact, it
means more pollution and higher electricity bills for Canadians."

NRCAN cites concerns over compact fluorescent light bulbs
(CFLs) — one of the possible alternatives to conventional light bulbs — as the
reason for their delay. But Health Canada, as well as other health organizations,
has stated that there are no health concerns regarding ultraviolet radiation
and electromagnetic fields from CFLs. Regarding mercury, the amount contained
in CFLs is small compared mercury emissions from generating electricity in
Canada, and can be readily managed through proper disposal programs.

"Other jurisdictions are moving forward to improve lighting
efficiency, and companies are responding by providing a range of alternative
light bulb choices to the marketplace," stated Row. "For example, Sears Canada
will be phasing out incandescent light bulbs in September."

Given the net health, economic and environmental benefits, the
Pembina Institute is recommending that NRCAN maintain the current timeline for
phasing out inefficient, incandescent light bulbs.

-30-

Background:

A copy of the
Pembina Institute's submission to NRCAN can be downloaded here <http://www.pembina.org/pub/2222&gt;

Contact:

Jesse Row (Calgary)
Director, Community Energy Solutions
Cell: 403-483-4810