One week after the 2016 U.S. presidential election and Washington carbon tax initiative vote, the Pembina Institute hosted a public online forum on the potential consequences for climate change, energy, and Canada.
A Q&A session followed presentations by guest speakers.
Listen to the audio recording
YouTube: What do the U.S. election results mean for climate, energy, and Canada?
Twitter Moments: #ClimateElection forum recap
Speakers
- Andrew Revkin, senior reporter on climate change at ProPublica (formerly Dot Earth blogger at the New York Times and senior fellow for environmental understanding at Pace University)
- Greg Dotson, vice president for energy policy at the Center for American Progress
- Kathryn Harrison, professor of political science at the University of British Columbia
Moderator
- Matt Horne, climate policy expert at the Pembina Institute
Read the media advisory: U.S. election results: What do they mean for climate, energy, and Canada?
Join the conversation on Twitter: #ClimateElection @Pembina
Share the event on Facebook: What does the U.S. election mean for climate and Canada?
Media coverage
Business in Vancouver: Power shift for carbon-pricing goals, hydro exports
Roundhouse Radio: Experts discuss what US election results mean for climate, energy and Canada
Daily Oil Bulletin: With Trump, Keystone XL Will Reach Oilsands; Trans Mountain Is Likely Too: Danielle Smith
Metro: Trump could ‘set back’ but hopefully not derail climate action: Pembina Institute
Georgia Straight: Inept U.S. broadcasting celebrities helped elect climate-change denier Donald Trump as president
Canadian GreenTech: Will election of Donald Trump throw a wrench into Canada’s climate agenda?